𓂀 in re: procedure of the court · docket thoth-doc-001 · block 9,725,836
source scales/api/app.py
source board/data.json
generated 2026-07-14t07:34:11z
window all · chain rh

thoth · procedure · docket thoth-doc-001 · block 9,725,836 · in force 2026-07-15

procedure.

how the engine reads a wallet, what the seven verdicts mean, and how to take the same answers as json. one instrument, one front door: the page and the api run the same engine, so a weighed address re-derives identically to its board row.

procedure i

the instrument

thoth is a court that reads robinhood chain. paste a wallet on the front page and the engine replays every swap that address ever made on the canonical tokens, prices each fill against pool state at that block, and files a verdict with the transaction hashes attached. the api below returns the same record as json. there is no second product and no second door.

everything is read-only. no login, no wallet connect, no key. a record is not an opinion about a wallet; it is a derivation from chain state, and anyone can run the derivation again. where the record says a wallet made +$444,499, it cites the fills that sum to it.

procedure ii

how the engine reads a wallet

a weighing is six readings taken in order. each one narrows what the wallet can claim to be.

01ingest

every transfer and swap event touching the address on the canonical robinhood-chain tokens, from pool genesis to the current block. nothing sampled, nothing extrapolated.

02replay

event-replay p&l. each fill is priced against the pool at the block it happened, not at today’s price. realized and unrealized are split; open positions carry entry mcap next to current mcap so the multiple is legible.

03basis

where the entry money came from. profit that stands on no visible on-chain cost basis is flagged unknown_basis. more than $10,000 of realized profit on unknown basis is the extractor test.

04timing

when the wallet acts. entry mcap, early-entry rate, median hold, reaction cadence. sub-second reaction with uniform sizing reads as a machine, whatever the p&l says.

05provenance

the funding graph. who funded the wallet, and whether that graph touches a token deployer before entry. deployer-linked funding before the first buy is the insider test. it requires proof, not vibes.

06judgment

weight 0–1000, grade a–f, confidence from sample size. thin histories are marked low-confidence or fresh, never faked. the record also carries a leadability reading: whether copying the wallet would have paid after its own price impact, stated as a mean net return with a confidence interval. up huge is not smart money.

procedure iii

the seven verdicts

one verdict per wallet, re-derived on every weighing. of the seven, only smart is entered in gold. the current record holds 115 wallets: 64 larp, 25 fresh, 20 bot, 5 degen, 1 smart, zero insiders, zero extractors. the gate is high, not broken.

SMART 1 of 115 · gold

a repeatable, provable edge. high win rate over enough trades to mean something, early entries that keep landing, realized profit that survives the basis reading. the only verdict the court renders in gold, and it has rendered it once.

DEGEN 5 of 115

active, sometimes very profitable, no proven edge. a wallet up $478,284 on 25 trades sits here until the sample and the basis say otherwise. one good season is weather, not climate.

INSIDER 0 of 115

funded from the deployer’s graph before entry. the reading demands an on-chain path from token deployer to entry capital, dated before the first buy. suspicion does not file this verdict; a funding path does. none proven on the current record.

EXTRACTOR 0 of 115

takes out more than open-market trading explains. over $10,000 realized on positions with no visible cost basis. this test falsified our own earlier thesis - the engine found zero genuine extractors and the record says so.

BOT 20 of 115

a machine. sub-second reactions, uniform sizing, high round-trip counts. not an insult and not a verdict on profitability - a statement about what is pressing the buttons.

LARP 64 of 115

the record contradicts the persona. trades a lot, loses, keeps talking. the largest class on the board, which is the finding.

FRESH 25 of 115

too thin to weigh. not enough history for any reading to bind. a deferral, not a compliment - the wallet is invited back when it has a record.

procedure iv

the record api

the api is free json over http. no key, no signup, no sdk - you already have the client. it is rate-limited per ip and returns the same records the pages render, because it is the same engine. built for agents as much as people.

get https://thoth.markets/board/data.json the full board ledger - 115 wallets, verdicts, fills, tx hashes. a static file; poll it as often as you like.
get https://api.scales.thoth.markets/weigh?a=0x… verdict on any robinhood-chain address. returns instantly; heavy wallets weigh in the background and you poll.
get https://api.scales.thoth.markets/health is the court in session. cache, queue, and ledger counts.
post https://api.scales.thoth.markets/agent/chat ask the chain in words; answers stream as server-sent events with receipts. models at /agent/models.
exhibit a · weigh a wallet get /weigh
$ curl -s 'https://api.scales.thoth.markets/weigh?a=0xdd35a714941a6777a835d21dc1b37fd474b59f4a'
{"status":"weighing","address":"0xdd35a714941a6777a835d21dc1b37fd474b59f4a"}

# the request enqueues and returns at once. poll until the verdict lands -
# a deep wallet can take over 100 seconds to weigh. verdicts stay fresh 300s.

$ sleep 8; curl -s 'https://api.scales.thoth.markets/weigh?a=0xdd35a714941a6777a835d21dc1b37fd474b59f4a'
{
  "address": "0xdd35a714941a6777a835d21dc1b37fd474b59f4a",
  "verdict": "SMART",
  "score": 692,
  "grade": "B",
  "win_rate": 0.8831,
  "realized_pnl": 444499,
  "n_trades": 64,
  "confidence": 0.719,
  "cached": true
}
exhibit b · poll until filed shell
$ U='https://api.scales.thoth.markets/weigh?a=0x5638484ba2d2f1d1d35020572b0aa439a9869192'
$ until r=$(curl -s "$U") && ! grep -q weighing <<<"$r"; do sleep 5; done; echo "$r"
exhibit c · the board ledger get /board/data.json
$ curl -s https://thoth.markets/board/data.json | jq '.wallets[0]
    | {address, verdict, score, grade, realized_pnl, win_rate, n_trades, confidence}'
{
  "address": "0xdd35a714941a6777a835d21dc1b37fd474b59f4a",
  "verdict": "SMART",
  "score": 692,
  "grade": "B",
  "realized_pnl": 444499,
  "win_rate": 0.8831,
  "n_trades": 64,
  "confidence": 0.719
}

# each wallet also carries provenance, tags, leadability {verdict, ci_lo, ci_hi},
# open holdings {entry_mcap, now_mcap, multiple}, and a fill-by-fill record
# with a tx hash per row. top-level: generated, window, chain, tokens, eth_usd.
exhibit d · ask the court post /agent/chat · sse
$ curl -sN https://api.scales.thoth.markets/agent/chat \
    -H 'content-type: application/json' \
    -d '{"messages":[{"role":"user","content":"/weigh 0xdd35a714941a6777a835d21dc1b37fd474b59f4a"}]}'

# answers stream as server-sent events: text frames, tool frames with the
# receipts the answer stands on, then {"type":"done"}. one hot ip gets told
# the scales are busy instead of a raw 429.

conduct. a good verdict is cached 300s; a failed weigh returns UNWEIGHED and is retryable after 30s · addresses are 0x-prefixed 40-hex · the ledger file is static and cheap, the weigh queue is serialized and is not · scrape the ledger, not the queue.

procedure v

trust

q.

is a verdict for sale?

a.

no. never. there is no fee that files one, no fee that changes one, no fee that removes one. a verdict is a derivation from chain state; the only way to change it is to change what the chain says, by trading differently.

q.

can a verdict be wrong?

a.

yes, and it can be appealed - with a hash. every record cites the transactions it derives from. pull /board/data.json, replay the fills, and if the sum disagrees with the record, the record loses. that is the point of publishing the derivation.

q.

why is only one wallet smart?

a.

because the test is repeatable edge, not size of win. the board holds wallets up six figures that are filed degen, since nothing in their basis or sample proves the win repeats. up huge is not smart money. a board where everyone is smart is an advertisement.

q.

does the court trade against its own record?

a.

the engine is read-only. it holds no position in the wallets it weighs and takes no side of any fill it cites. it reads, it files.

q.

what do you collect about me?

a.

nothing. no accounts, no login, no wallet connect, no analytics beacons. the pages are static files; the api sees an ip for rate-limiting and keeps no profile of it.

q.

which chain, which tokens?

a.

robinhood chain, read deeply, on the canonical tokens the board tracks. one chain read to the bottom beats ten chains read to the headline. the token list ships inside /board/data.json with pool addresses, so the scope of the court is itself on the record.

thoth · procedure · certified against chain state · verdicts never for sale re-derive: /board/data.json